Studi Kualitatif: Praktik Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Inovasi di Sektor Publik Kabupaten Gresik

Authors

  • Muhammad Maulana Ardiansyah Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Khoiril Chilmy Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Muhammad Alkirom Wildan Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30640/jmcbus.v3i1.3559

Keywords:

Human resource management practices, Innovation, Public sector, Gresik

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the implementation of human resource management (HRM) practices that facilitate innovation in the public sector in a developing country. Qualitative method was engaged whereby a semi-structured interview was conducted to get the responses of two groups of employees which are top management and executive in two types of public organizations which are awarded and non-awarded. The collected data was later analyzed thematically. The results show that there are differences and similarities among the public agencies in terms of their implementation of HRM practices that facilitate innovation. Apparently, the awarded public agencies do follow HRM practices that really facilitate innovation such as local training, provide more types of rewards to their employees and set a higher minimum level of innovation in their performance evaluation. This research confines only 10 public agencies in Gresik. Future studies might want to include a larger sample size to make the findings more extensive. It also would be interesting to know different approaches in HRM implemented in the private organizations as well as to examine their influences on performance and other organizational factors. Good and fair HRM practices such as training, reward and performance appraisal practices that focus on innovation facilitate and produce more innovative employees and organization innovation. Thus, public managers should implement them to a higher extent.

 

 

References

Barata, K., Cain, P., & Thurston, A. (1999). From accounting to accountability: Managing accounting records as a strategic resource. International Records Management Trust, World Bank infoDEV Programme.

Hasan, Z. (2021). Pendidikan karakter dan pemberantasan korupsi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(2), 45-58.

Hasan, Z., Hartono, B., & Rahmawati, I. (2022). Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ).

Hasan, Z., Ramadhan, R. W., & Ayyasy, R. (2024). Implementasi nilai-nilai NKRI dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, berbangsa, dan bernegara. Vol 1(2), 283-291.

Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruption. Oxford, England: University of California Press.

Munawir. (2007). Analisa Laporan Keuangan (Edisi ke-4). Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Romadhon, F., & Naufal, M. F. (2024). Kenali nilai-nilai anti korupsi. DJKN Kemenkeu, halaman tidak tersedia.

Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2003). Accounting Information Systems (9th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Prentice Hall, Joset-Bas Inc.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Waluyo, M. (2018). Pendidikan Anti Korupsi untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Widiartana, G., & Setyawan, V. (2020). Urgensi pendidikan antikorupsi terhadap pencegahan korupsi dalam pendidikan dasar. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, Query date: 2024-06-12, 06:08:00.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-17

How to Cite

Muhammad Maulana Ardiansyah, Khoiril Chilmy, & Muhammad Alkirom Wildan. (2024). Studi Kualitatif: Praktik Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Inovasi di Sektor Publik Kabupaten Gresik. Journal of Management and Creative Business, 3(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.30640/jmcbus.v3i1.3559