Implementasi Sistem Manajemen Anti Penyuapan Berbasis ISO 37001: 2016 Pada Program Magang Mahasiswa Bersertifikat di PTPN XI

Nurleila Jum'ati; Siti Wulandari; Rezki Binuntsa Mutmaina; Yani Susanti; Surya Ani Devita

doi:10.30640/ekonomika45.v12i2.4591

Authors

Nurleila Jum'ati Universitas Wijaya Putra
Siti Wulandari Universitas Wijaya Putra
Rezki Binuntsa Mutmaina Universitas Wijaya Putra
Yani Susanti Universitas Wijaya Putra
Surya Ani Devita Universitas Wijaya Putra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30640/ekonomika45.v12i2.4591

Keywords:

ISO 37001:2016, Anti-Bribery Management System, Internship, PTPN XI, Stated Owned Entreprise

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is very high and widespread in both state-owned and private companies. The government has made various efforts to prevent acts of corruption that can hinder the growth and continuity of national development. One of the efforts made is through the implementation of an anti-bribery management system based on ISO 37001:2016. The purpose of the internship is to find out the implementation of the anti-bribery management system at the PTPN XI head office. This study uses a qualitative approach, data collection techniques through observation, FGD, and documentation using interactive data analysis techniques (data reduction, data presentation, and concluding). SMAP's external audit results show that there are 3 minor findings related to the scope of application of the anti-bribery management system which is currently limited to the head office, while for existing business units that have not implemented an anti-bribery management system based on ISO 37001:2016, the decree is not implemented. the Whistle Blowing System (WBS) management team where the complaint center is only managed by one person which will allow for manipulation of complaint data and the bribery risk identification process and not all subsections are identified for bribery risk, risk assessment is only carried out based on the business process of the work unit in general and less specific PTPN XI has implemented an anti-bribery management system in the head office environment as evidenced by the SMAP audit process which is carried out consistently every year to realize good corporate governance.

References

Aslam, N. (2021). Pencegahan korupsi di sektor BUMN dalam perspektif pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.818

Astutik, M., & Rusimamto, P. W. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran multimedia interaktif berbantuan software Lectora Inspire untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar pada mata pelajaran teknik listrik di SMK Negeri 2 Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 5(1), 107–114.

Cardoni, A., Kiseleva, E., & De Luca, F. (2020). Continuous auditing and data mining for strategic risk control and anticorruption: Creating ‘fair’ value in the digital age. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2650

Dewi, I. K., et al. (2022). Peningkatan kinerja UMKM melalui pengelolaan keuangan. Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi, UNTAG Surabaya, 23–36.

Gazali, S., et al. (2024). Ikan Nomei, Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (pp. 1–98).

Haron, H., Ismail, I., Ibrahim, D. N., Darun, M. R., Zamli, K. Z., Abdullah, A., & Gui, A. (2018). The development of anti bribery management system: A preliminary study. In 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech) (pp. xx–xx). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2018.8528130

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2016). Sistem manajemen anti penyuapan – Persyaratan dengan panduan penggunaan (ISO 37001).

Isharyanto, Husodo, J. A., & Madalina, M. (2021). The legal risk to sustainable role of state-owned enterprises management in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 724(1), 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/724/1/012090

Januarsyah, M. P. Z., Astawa, I. G. P., Atmasasmita, R., & Gultom, E. (2020). The idea of implementing a deferred prosecution agreement with the anti-bribery management system in corruption crime management by corporations in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1379–1384. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.158

Kristiawati, et al. (2019). Citra merek, persepsi harga, dan nilai pelanggan terhadap keputusan pembelian pada Mini Market Indomaret Lontar Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Manajemen (JMM 17), 6(2), 27–36.

Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam penelitian pendidikan bahasa. http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT

Peltier-Rivest, D. (2021). Corruption at Rolls-Royce: Can it happen again? Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2021-0060

Sholeh, A. A., et al. (2024). Kompensasi terhadap motivasi kerja karyawan pada PT. Insolent Raya di Surabaya. Journal of Management and Creative Business, 2(1), 82–96.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif. Alfabeta.

Veselovská, L., Závadský, J., & Závadská, Z. (2020). Mitigating bribery risks to strengthen the corporate social responsibility in accordance with the ISO 37001. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2943–2955. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1909

Waluyati, M. (2020). Penerapan focus group discussion (FGD) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan memanfaatkan lingkungan sebagai sumber belajar. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v8i1.27089