Analisis Model Score (Stimulus, Capability, Collusion, Opportunity, Rationalization dan Ego) Terhadap Korupsi

Studi Pada Pemerintah Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2018-2022

Authors

  • Yane Nurhaliezah Politeknik Negeri Lampung
  • Rusmianto Rusmianto Politeknik Negeri Lampung
  • Destia Pentiana Politeknik Negeri Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30640/ekonomika45.v12i2.4546

Keywords:

Corruption, SCCORE Model, Stimulus, Capability, Collusion

Abstract

Corruption refers to an unlawful act that involves the misuse of authority to benefit an organization while causing harm to the state's economy. This research aims to examine the impact of stimulus, capability, collusion, opportunity, rationalization, and ego on corruption within provincial governments in Indonesia during the 2018-2022 period. The study population consists of all provinces in Indonesia. The sample selection was conducted using the purposive sampling method. Based on this approach, 34 provincial governments met the criteria for inclusion in the study. To test the hypotheses, this research employs IBM SPSS software version 26, utilizing the logistic regression analysis method. The findings indicate that, in part, capability and opportunity positively influence corruption, while rationalization and ego have a negative effect. Meanwhile, stimulus and collusion do not significantly impact corruption.

References

Achmad, T., et al. (2022). Hexagon fraud: Detection of fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(13), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013

Anandya, D., & Ramdhana, K. (2024, May). Laporan hasil pemantauan tren korupsi tahun 2023. https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Narasi%20Laporan%20Hasil%20Pemantauan%20Tren%20Korupsi%20Tahun%202023.pdf

Apriasanti, S. D., & Widajantie, T. D. (2022). Pengaruh opini audit dan temuan audit terhadap tingkat korupsi pemerintah daerah. JIMAT: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 13(2), 728–737. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsa.v4i1.12454

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia. (2020, May). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). A report to the nations: Occupational fraud 2022 (pp. 1–96). https://www.acfe.com/-/media/files/acfe/pdfs/rttn/2022/2022-report-to-thenations.pdf

Chang, L., et al. (2023). Narcissistic CEOs, dynamic capability, and green innovation. Heliyon, 9, e18898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18898

Christiawan, W. (2016). Analisa kasus korupsi pengadaan alat kesehatan di Provinsi Banten dan Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(28), 131–148. https://journal.unika.ac.id/index.php/jab/article/view/1340/827

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement.

Fitri, F., & Nadirsyah. (2020). Pengaruh tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, dan kapabilitas terhadap pengadaan barang/jasa di pemerintahan Aceh dengan pemoderasi budaya etis organisasi. JIMEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 5(1), 69–84. https://jim.usk.ac.id/EKA/article/view/15437

Fuadi, I., & Mabrur, A. (2021). Faktor-faktor penentu korupsi pada pemerintah daerah di Indonesia. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v6i4.410

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). (2024). Tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan profesi/jabatan. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-profesijabatan

Kristiawati, et al. (2019). Citra merek, persepsi harga, dan nilai pelanggan terhadap keputusan pembelian pada mini market Indomaret Lontar Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Manajemen (JMM 17), 6(2), 27–36.

Maria, E. (2019). Eksplorasi kesempatan untuk melakukan fraud di pemerintah daerah Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 16(1), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2019.01

Maria, E., et al. (2018). Eksplorasi faktor tekanan untuk melakukan fraud di pemerintah daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik, 1(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2019.01

Maria, E., et al. (2019). Desentralisasi fiskal dan probabilitas terjadinya korupsi: Sebuah bukti empiris dari Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v22i1.2036

Marks, J. (2012). The mind behind the fraudster’s crime: Key behavioral and environmental elements. https://www.crowe.com/

Meyer, M. N., et al. (2023). Wrestling with social and behavioral genomics: The ethical implications of social and behavioral genomics. Hastings Center Report, 53(2), 2–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1477

Muhtar, et al. (2018). Corruption in Indonesian local government: Study on triangle fraud theory. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(2), 536–552. https://myjurnal.mohe.gov.my/public/article-view.php?id=125114

Nuruddina, M., & Rahmawati, I. P. (2021). Fraud triangle dan korupsi pada pemerintah daerah di Indonesia. JRAK: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 12(1), 110–124. http://jurnal.unismabekasi.ac.id/

Rottweiler, B., & Gill, P. (2022). Individual differences in personality moderate the effects of perceived group deprivation on violent extremism: Evidence from a United Kingdom nationally representative survey. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 790770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.790770

Sholeh, A., et al. (2024). Kompensasi terhadap motivasi kerja karyawan pada PT. Insolent Raya di Surabaya. Journal of Management and Creative Business, 2(1), 82–96.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. CV Alfabeta.

Utami, D. P. W., & Purnamasari, D. I. (2021). The impact of ethics and fraud pentagon theory on academic fraud behavior. Journal of Business and Information Systems, 3(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v3i1.88

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128

Wicaksono, G. S., & Prabowo, T. J. W. (2022). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi korupsi pada pemerintah daerah di Jawa Tengah menggunakan teori fraud triangle. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(1), 1016–1028. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i1.710

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs/1537/

Yuniarti, R. D., & Linuhung, T. S. (2023). Analysis of factors that influence the occurrence of corruption in the perspective of fraud hexagon. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 5(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v5i2.988

Downloads

Published

2025-06-09

How to Cite

Yane Nurhaliezah, Rusmianto Rusmianto, & Destia Pentiana. (2025). Analisis Model Score (Stimulus, Capability, Collusion, Opportunity, Rationalization dan Ego) Terhadap Korupsi: Studi Pada Pemerintah Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2018-2022. EKONOMIKA45 :  Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi Bisnis, Kewirausahaan, 12(2), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.30640/ekonomika45.v12i2.4546

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.