Pengaruh Rekrutmen dan Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. UBK

Annisa Apriliani; Amilia Tresnawati

doi:10.30640/ekonomika45.v13i1.5546

Authors

Annisa Apriliani Universitas Teknologi Digital
Amilia Tresnawati Universitas Teknologi Digital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30640/ekonomika45.v13i1.5546

Keywords:

Compensation, Employee Performance, Quantitative Research, Recruitment, Regression Analysis

Abstract

This study aims to determine the various elements, such as efficient hiring practices and equitable compensation, that affect PT. UBK employees' performance. The researchers employed a quantitative approach to collect data, distributing a likert scale questionnaire to 100 PT. UBK personnel. The slovin formula was used to choose the sample. According to the study's findings, the regression coefficients for the constant variable (a) is 3. 405, variable X1 (reception) is 0. 449, and variable X2 (compensation) is 0. 382. It is evident from these results that variable X2 (compensation) increased the least. Employee performance is significantly impacted by the simultaneous hiring and payment processes. The f count was 42. 871 when we employed a joint test known as the f test, which is greater than the f table value of 3. 09. This indicates that we accept the alternative hypothesis (Ha) and reject the null hypothesis (H0). The t count for recruitment (X1) is 7. 334 based on the individual test utilizing the t test, which is greater than the t table value of 1. 984. Since the Ttable value of 1. 984 is lower than the computed t value for compensation (X2), H0 is likewise rejected and Ha is approved. The coefficient of determination test's R Square comes out at 0. 469, or 46.9%.

References

Arraniri, I. (2021). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Cirebon.

Avengelista, V. G., Hidayat, R., & Panjaitan, S. (2022). Pengaruh rekrutmen, career development, dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan di PT Indonesia Epson Industry. Jurnal Daya Saing, 11(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v11i2.3989

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Jumlah dan persentase penduduk bekerja dan pengangguran. Diakses Mei 2025.

Databoks. (2025). Jumlah pekerja industri tekstil Indonesia skala besar dan menengah. Diakses Mei 2025.

Firdaus, V., & Oetarjo. (2022). Buku ajar manajemen kompensasi. Sidoarjo. https://doi.org/10.21070/2022/978-623-464-039-7

Habib, A. I., & Djastuti, I. (2018). Pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel intervening (Studi pada CV Manfaat di Ambarawa). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 7(4). ISSN (Online): 2337-3792

Komala, L. (2017). Pengaruh sistem rekrutmen, kompensasi, dan motivasi terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT Bina Asia Tanggerang. Jurnal PekoBis, 2. https://doi.org/10.32493/pekobis.v2i3.P16-26.662

Nugraha, A., & Tjahjawati, S. S. (2017). Pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja karyawan. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Indonesia, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.35697/jrbi.v3i3.942

Priartini, M. N., & Undiksha, R. W. I. P. (2020). Analisis proses rekrutmen daily worker. Jurnal Manajemen dan Perhotelan Pariwisata, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jmpp.v3i2.29077

Sarpan, Kudratul, A., & Awaludin, M. (2024). Pengaruh rekrutmen, seleksi, dan pelatihan terhadap kinerja karyawan PT Qes Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen, 15(1).

Sihotang, H. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Jakarta.

Suryani, N. L. (2014). Pengaruh sistem rekrutmen dan kompensasi terhadap kinerja karyawan PT Cakrawala Citramega Multifinance di Ciputat Tanggerang. Jurnal JSDM, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.32493/JJSDM.v1i2.1163

Utama, M. Z. (2022). Pengaruh rekrutmen terhadap kinerja satuan pengamanan di lingkungan Kelurahan Cempaka Putih Timur. Jurnal Kelola, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.32509/kelola.v8i1.2097

Utama, M. Z. (2022). Pengaruh rekrutmen, kompensasi terhadap kinerja satuan pengamanan di lingkungan Kelurahan Cempaka Putih Timur. Jurnal Kelola, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.32509/kelola.v8i1.2097

Widowati, R., & Agustin, A. (2021). Analisis proses rekrutmen dan seleksi karyawan pada PT Lunto Prima Megah. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 5(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.52160/ejmm.v5i1.504