Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Aset Tetap Pemerintah Daerah
(Studi Kasus Bpkad Kota Surabaya)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30640/jumma45.v5i1.5937Keywords:
Digital Asset Management Systems, Fixed Asset Management, Good Governance, Public Sector Accountability, Regional Government AssetsAbstract
This survey evaluates the responsibilities related to fixed asset management of the Surabaya City Regional Financial Asset Management Agency (BPKAD) based on the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation No. 19 of 2016. This study adopts a descriptive qualitative approach through detailed observation, interviews, and document analysis. The analysis focuses on the five main steps of municipal asset management: planning, implementation, operation, reporting, and accountability. The survey results indicate that digital systems such as SIMBADA, SIGASDA, E-SIMKOD, and SIPGAD contribute to improving the transparency of audit histories and maintaining audit records. All stages are generally carried out in accordance with existing regulations. Nevertheless, there are still several unresolved issues, including limitations in human resource capacity within the regional office (OPD), discrepancies between the condition of physical assets and recorded data, and technical problems during the reporting period. Clear regulations, the digitization of systems, and oversight by external agencies such as the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK), the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), and the Ministry of Home Affairs strengthen accountability. Overall, accountability has been achieved, although improvements in system optimization and human resource competence remain necessary.
References
Agustin, T. (2022). Analisis pengelolaan aset daerah pada badan pengelolaan keuangan dan aset daerah. VISA: Journal of Visions and Ideas, 3(1), 216–236.
Ashara, S. N., & Hidayat, M. T. (2025). Pengaruh akuntabilitas, transparansi, pengendalian intern, dan sistem informasi akuntansi terhadap efektivitas pengelolaan anggaran di Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan dan Aset Daerah Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(2), 1488–1502.
Chairunni, & Lubis. (2023). Analisis pengelolaan aset pada bagian keuangan dan aset Dinas Kesehatan Kota Medan. Jurnal Mutiara Ilmu Akuntansi, 2(1), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.55606/jumia.v2i1.2385
Danysa. (2020). Pemanfaatan barang milik daerah berupa tanah melalui izin pemakaian tanah Kota Surabaya. Jurist-Diction, 3(4), 1541–1556. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i4.20219
Devi, L., & Saputri, A. (2024). Fixed asset management at the regional finance and asset agency. International Journal of Management and Leadership, 1(2), 166–170. https://ejournal.poltekbaubau.ac.id/index.php/ijml/article/view/997
Mediaty, M., Ruslan, R., Ulman, A., Mahfud, M., & Ridwan, S. F. (2024). Assessing regional asset management practices in the provincial government of West Sulawesi: Insights from APIP supervision based on Permendagri No. 19/2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v14i1.63728
Setiawan, A., Arevin, A. T., & Syavardie, Y. (2025). Optimizing public asset management through digital integration, accountability, and sustainable local government policies. Jurnal Ar Ro’is Mandalika (ARMADA), 5(3). https://doi.org/10.59613/armada.v5i3.5305
Sisca, Y., Sarwani, S., & Adriani, A. (2025). The effect of asset management on the effectiveness of local government fixed asset management. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 11(7B), 195–213.
Tutu, A. E., Kalangi, L., & Walandouw, S. K. (2025). Analysis of fixed asset utilization management of local government at the regional financial and asset agency (BKAD) of South Minahasa Regency. Accountability, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.35794/ja.v14i02.63571
Wahyuni, E. S., & Rahmani, N. (2025). Fixed asset management: The role of regional asset information systems in the utilization of unused assets in the local government of Bengkalis Regency. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 35(11). https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i11.p02
Wahyuningsih, C. D., & Selly, R. N. (2024). Implementation of regional asset management policy based on Permendagri Number 19 of 2016. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 21(1), 137–151.
Yulitiawati, Y., & Rusmidarti, R. (2021). Analisis pengukuran kinerja organisasi sektor publik dengan menggunakan pendekatan value for money di Kabupaten OKU. JETAP, 91–109. http://journal.unbara.ac.id/index.php/etap/article/view/966
Yusnawati. (2024). Corresponding author: Yusnawati. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9, 216–227.
Zacky Afkar Dame Riamah, A., Wulandari, E., & Eka Wardani, W. (2025). Strategi pengelolaan aset tetap daerah Kabupaten Jember dalam meraih opini WTP (dari disclaimer hingga WTP berturut-turut). Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(3), 587–593. https://padangjurnal.web.id/index.php/menulis/article/view/158
Zhanbayev, R. A., Yerkin, A. Y., Shutaleva, A. V., Irfan, M., Gabelashvili, K., Temirbaeva, G. R., Chazova, I. Y., & Abdykadyrkyzy, R. (2023). State asset management paradigm in the quasi-public sector and environmental sustainability: Insights from the Republic of Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1037023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Mahasiswa Manajemen dan Akuntansi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
