Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi di Kota Kupang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30640/jumma45.v4i1.4654Keywords:
Academic Cheating Behavior, Arrogance, Capability, Collusion, OpportunityAbstract
This research aims to determine the influence of the Fraud Hexagon theory on the academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Kupang City. This research employs a quantitative approach using the IBM SPSS 25 analysis tool. The research objects encompass four universities in Kupang City, namely Universitas Nusa Cendana, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana, and Universitas Muhammadiyah Kupang. The results of this research indicate that the elements within the Fraud Hexagon theory, namely rationalization, arrogance, and collusion, have an influence on the academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Kupang City. The elements of pressure, opportunity, and capability do not have an influence on the academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Kupang City. Simultaneously, pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, and collusion influence the academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Kupang City.
References
Ababneh, K. I., Ahmed, K., & Dedousis, E. (2020). Predictors of cheating in online exams among business students during the COVID pandemic: Testing the theory of planned behavior.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–221.
Apsari, A. K., & Suhartini, D. (2021). Religiosity as moderating of accounting student academic fraud with a hexagon theory approach. Accounting and Finance Studies, 1(3), 212–231.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Indeks Perilaku Anti Korupsi (IPAK) Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id
Dewi, G. A. R., & Pertama, G. A. W. (2020). Fraud diamond dan dampaknya. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 5(2), 27–46.
Fadersair, K., & Subagyo, S. (2019). Perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa akuntansi: Dimensi fraud pentagon (studi kasus pada mahasiswa prodi akuntansi Ukrida). Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 12(2), 122–147.
Goodstats.id. (2024, Maret 5). Seberapa tinggi kasus korupsi di Indonesia? https://goodstats.id
Islam, M. F., & Jatmika, S. (2024). Pengaruh dimensi fraud hexagon terhadap kecurangan akademik peserta didik di SMK. G-COUNS: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8(2), 1015.
Jamilah, M., Astriani, D., & Septiawati, R. (2023). Pengaruh dimensi fraud hexagon terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik (Survei pada mahasiswa akuntansi Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang). Jurnal Mahasiswa Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 2(4), 863–880.
Kompas.com. (2024, Juni 8). Nasib mahasiswa UM Palembang pelaku plagiat skripsi, gagal wisuda dan diskors. https://www.kompas.com
Malva, M., Dewa, C., & Maulana, A. (2024). Hexagon fraud: Exploration of academic fraud in accounting students at universities in Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(2), 933–948.
Murdiansyah, I., Sudarma, M., & Nurkholis. (2017). Pengaruh dimensi fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik (Studi empiris pada mahasiswa Magister Akuntansi Universitas Brawijaya). Akuntansi Aktual, 4(2), 121–133.
Pratiwi, N. A. S., & Munari, M. (2024). Dimensi fraud hexagon dalam mempengaruhi kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa akuntansi. Jambura Economic Education Journal, 6(2), 455–468.
Selviana, & Irwansyah. (2023). Pengaruh fraud hexagon, faktor organisasi dan integritas terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa akuntansi. Edunomika, 8(1), 1–20.
Sihombing, M., & Budiartha, I. K. (2020). Analisis pengaruh fraud triangle terhadap kecurangan akademik (Academic Fraud) mahasiswa akuntansi Universitas Udayana. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(2), 361.
Tempo. (2024, November 18). Safrina mahasiswa Unair yang viral di medsos, ini sanksi akademik yang diterimanya. https://www.tempo.co
Theotama, G., Waskita, Y. D., & Hapsari, A. N. S. (2023). Fraud hexagon in the motives to commit academic fraud. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 26(1), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v26i1.7395
Tonasa, M., & Setyorini, C. T. R. I. (2019). Reasons for accounting students to commit academic fraud: Qualitative interview studies. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen dan Ekonomi, 21(1), 23–31.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381.
Zachra, F., Chaniago, D., Rizqy, M., & Putra, S. (2023). Menggali akar masalah korupsi di Indonesia: Analisis terhadap faktor-faktor pendorong dan solusi pemberantasannya. JERUMI: Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary, 1(2), 548–553.
Zamzam, I., Mahdi, S., & Ansar, R. (2017). Pengaruh diamond fraud dan tingkat religiusitas terhadap kecurangan akademik (Studi pada mahasiswa S-1 di lingkungan perguruan tinggi se kota Ternate). Akuntansi Peradaban, 3, 1–24.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Mahasiswa Manajemen dan Akuntansi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
