Perbandingan Kinerja Model ARIMA pada Forecasting Harga Saham PT Erajaya Swasembada Tbk menggunakan Data Historis 10 Tahun, 5 Tahun dan 3 Tahun

Authors

  • Ribkah Duma Lalang Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Kevin G. Djabibi Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Raymond Axel Mara Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Putri Widarajati Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Radian Januari Situmeang Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30640/inisiatif.v5i3.7170

Keywords:

ARIMA, Forecasting, PT Erajaya Swasembada Tbk, Stock Price, Time Series

Abstract

This study aims to compare the performance of the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model in forecasting the stock price of PT Erajaya Swasembada Tbk using 10-year, 5-year, and 3-year historical daily data. The research data consisted of daily stock prices from 2016–2025 obtained from Yahoo Finance and company fundamental data including revenue, net income, total assets, EPS, and ROE. The study employed a quantitative approach using time series forecasting analysis with the ARIMA model. The analysis stages included data preprocessing, stationarity testing using the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) Test, differencing, model identification through ACF and PACF plots, model selection based on Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), residual testing using the Ljung-Box Test, and accuracy evaluation using RMSE, MAE, and MAPE. The results showed that all data became stationary after first-order differencing. The best models obtained were ARIMA(0,1,0) for 10-year data, ARIMA(0,1,1) for 5-year data, and ARIMA(0,1,2) for 3-year data. Based on the evaluation results, the ARIMA(0,1,1) model using 5-year historical data produced the best forecasting performance with an AIC value of 9523.612 and a MAPE value of 1.826%. The forecasting results indicated that the stock price of PT Erajaya Swasembada Tbk is predicted to move relatively stable around IDR 407 per share for the next 20 trading days. This study indicates that the use of historical periods that are more relevant to current market conditions can produce more accurate forecasting results.

References

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.

Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (5th ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

Chatfield, C. (2019). The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction (7th ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.

Fahmi, I. (2020). Pengantar Pasar Modal. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Ekonometrika (5th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hanke, J. E., & Wichern, D. W. (2021). Business Forecasting (10th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: Principles and Practice (3rd ed.). Melbourne: OTexts.

Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297–303.

Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(1), 54–74.

Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. D. (2019). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tsay, R. S. (2019). Analysis of Financial Time Series (4th ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

Widarjono, A. (2020). Analisis Statistika Multivariat Terapan. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02

How to Cite

Ribkah Duma Lalang, Kevin G. Djabibi, Raymond Axel Mara, Putri Widarajati, & Radian Januari Situmeang. (2026). Perbandingan Kinerja Model ARIMA pada Forecasting Harga Saham PT Erajaya Swasembada Tbk menggunakan Data Historis 10 Tahun, 5 Tahun dan 3 Tahun. Inisiatif: Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 5(3), 821–834. https://doi.org/10.30640/inisiatif.v5i3.7170