Kepemimpinan Camat terhadap E-Sukma dan E-Sakip dalam Terwujudnya Kinerja Birokrasi Efektif dan Akuntabel
Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Bugul Kidul Kota Pasuruan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30640/inisiatif.v5i2.6209Keywords:
Accountable Bureaucracy, E-SAKIP, E-SUKMA, Leadership, Policy ImplementationAbstract
Regional development is carried out as a means to improve the quality of life of the community with the support of effective and accountable public services. Bugul Kidul District has a strategic role in realizing digital-based governance through E-SUKMA and E-SAKIP, so this research is focused on analyzing the role of sub-district leadership in following up on the results of E-SUKMA and E-SAKIP based on the theory of policy implementation of George Edward III. This study aims to analyze the role of sub-district leadership in achieving the E-SUKMA and E-SAKIP targets in realizing effective and accountable bureaucratic performance in Bugul Kidul District, Pasuruan City. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach conducted through data collection in the form of interviews, direct observations, and document tracing. Referring to Government Regulation No. 17 of 2018 concerning Districts, Ministerial Regulation of PANRB Number 14 of 2017 concerning Public Services, Ministerial Regulation of PANRB Number 88 of 2021 concerning SAKIP, and the theory of policy implementation of George Edward III. From the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded that the leadership of the Bugul Kidul Sub-district has encouraged the achievement of the E-SUKMA and E-SAKIP targets administratively and supports the realization of effective and accountable bureaucratic performance, but the use of survey results and performance evaluation as a basis for continuous improvement and strategic decision-making still needs to be optimized.
References
Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Bungin, B. (2009). Penelitian kualitatif: Komunikasi, ekonomi, kebijakan publik, dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2017 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Survei Kepuasan Masyarakat Unit Penyelenggara Pelayanan Publik. (2017). Kementerian PANRB.
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 88 Tahun 2021 tentang Evaluasi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. (2021). Kementerian PANRB.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. (2019). Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Kecamatan. (2018). Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. (2014). Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). Pearson Education.
Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (1995). Metode penelitian survei. LP3ES.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian bisnis. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian manajemen. Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. (2014). Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anissatul Faiza, Bambang Sutikno, Eni Erwantiningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
