Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Metode Economic Value Added (EVA) dan Metode Rasio Rentabilitas pada PT BPR BKK Kab. Tegal (Perseroda)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30640/inisiatif.v4i1.3159Keywords:
Financial Performance, Profitability Ratio, Economic Value AddedAbstract
Financial performance is a tool to analyze how a company runs well to be able to get maximum profit. The purpose of this study is to compare the financial performance of companies that apply the Rentability Ratio Method by considering Return on Asset (ROA), BOPO (Operating Cost of Operating Income), Net Interest Margin (NIM), and Economic Value Added (EVA). Quantitative descriptive research is used. In this research, the data collection method is a documentation study, namely the financial statements published by PT BPR BKK KAB TEGAL (Perseroda), and secondary data is used. The results showed that PT BPR BKK KAB TEGAL (Perseroda) has excellent financial performance. Judging from ROA, the company is in a very healthy category with an average of 2.2%, judging from BOPO, the company is in a very healthy category with an average of 83.66%, and judging from NIM, the company is in a very healthy category with an average of 9.18%. Because EVA is negative with an average of Rp. -3,000,901, the company does not experience economic added value. The results of the comparison between ROA, BOPO, NIM, and EVA show that the company should use the EVA method to take into account financial performance with elements of the cost of equity and provide a detailed explanation of the company's added value.
References
Adam Permana Putra, Mufidah Sahla Oktavianty, & Nur Aini Qurrata A’yun. (2022). Analisis Time Series Dan Cross Section Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan 3 Perusahaan Manufaktur. Trending: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ekonomi, 1(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.30640/trending.v1i1.474
Anastasya, W., & Ibrahim, M. (2022). Penilaian Kinerja Keuangan Menggunakan Metode Economic Value Added (Eva) Pada PT United Tractors, Tbk. 9(2), 1–13.
Harahap, S. S. (2013). Analisis kritis atas laporan keuangan. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Hery. (2018). Analisis Laporan Keuangan : Intergrated and comperhesive edtion. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Grasindo. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=cFkjEAAAQBAJ
Kaunang, C. A. S., Kinerja, A. P., Perbandingan, A., Keuangan, K., & Menggunakan, P. (2011). RASIO PROFITABILITAS DAN ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED PADA PERUSAHAAN YANG TERGABUNG DALAM LQ 45 Oleh : Cendy A . S . Kaunang Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Jurusan Manajemen Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado Jurnal EMBA Vol . 1 No . 3 September 2013 , Hal . 648-657 . 1(3), 648–658.
Martalena, D. (2020). Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analisis Rasio Keuangan Dan EVA Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Pada LQ45 Periode 2013-2017. Manners, III, 53.
Munawir, S. (2010). Analisa laporan keuangan (4th ed.). Yogyakarta:Liberty.
Rudianto. (2013). Akuntansi Manajemen: Informasi Untuk Pengambilan Keputusan Strategis. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Sawir, A. (2005). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan dan Perencanaan Keuangan Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sucipto. (2018). Penilaian Kinerja Keuangan. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis FE Universitas Utara, Medan.
Sugiyono. (2014a). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan kombinasi (mixed Methods). Bandung : Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2014b). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Utama, S. (1997). Economic Value Added: Pengukur Penciptaan Nilai Perusahaan. Jakarta: Usahawan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Inisiatif: Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Manajemen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.