Analisis Struktur Kinerja dan Konsep Keunggulan Komparatif Industri

Authors

  • Melinda Wirastiti Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Aditya Arga Widhyasa Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Muhammad Yasin Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30640/inisiatif.v3i3.2562

Keywords:

Performance Structure, Comparative Advantage, Industry

Abstract

Industry is a crucial sector in a country's economy because it contributes significantly to economic growth, job creation and social welfare. This article aims to analyze the structure of industrial performance and the concept of comparative advantage in Indonesia. The industry performance structure is evaluated based on allocative efficiency, technical efficiency, inflation effects, equality, technological progress, product quality, employment opportunities and profits. The concept of comparative advantage explains that a country gains advantages by specializing in the production and export of goods or services that have relatively lower production costs compared to other countries. This analysis focuses on various factors that influence industry performance, such as the number and size of companies, level of product differentiation, market entry and exit barriers, government policies, macroeconomic conditions, technological developments, and globalization. By implementing comparative advantage strategies, such as production efficiency, developing workforce skills, and improving infrastructure, it is hoped that it can increase the competitiveness of Indonesian industry in the global market. This article provides strategic recommendations to improve the performance and competitiveness of Indonesian industry, including the importance of specialization, increased market access, and industrial collaboration.

References

(Az Zakiyyah, 2020; Ekonomi & Mea, 2010; Fitri Elmawati et al., 2023; Iqbal Maulana et al., 2023; Mahesa, 2017)

Az Zakiyyah, N. A. (2020). Analisis Keunggulan Komparatif Komoditas Industri Pertahanan Indonesia Terhadap Asean 4 Dan China. Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 10(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v10i2.18022

Ekonomi, M., & Mea, A. (2010). Strategi industri kreatif pada usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah (umkm) dalam rangka menjawab tantangan masayarakat ekonomi asean (mea). Prosiding Pendidikan Ekonomi Sebagai Penggerak Dalam Menghadapi MEA.

Fitri Elmawati, Habibur Rohman, & Muhammad Yasin. (2023). Analisis Struktur Kinerja Dan Kluster Industri Unggulan. Jurnal Mahasiswa: Jurnal Ilmiah Penalaran Dan Penelitian Mahasiswa, 5(2), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.51903/jurnalmahasiswa.v5i2.609

Iqbal Maulana, Marcelly Cessa Manda Sari, & Muhammad Yasin. (2023). Analisis Struktur Kinerja Dan Konsep Keunggulan Komparatif Industri Di Indonesia. Student Research Journal, 1(3), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.55606/srjyappi.v1i3.327

Mahesa, B. (2017). Analisis Struktur, Perilaku Dan Kinerja Industri Minuman Di Indonesia Periode 2006 – 2009. Media Ekonomi, 18(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25105/me.v18i3.842

Published

2024-05-17

How to Cite

Melinda Wirastiti, Aditya Arga Widhyasa, & Muhammad Yasin. (2024). Analisis Struktur Kinerja dan Konsep Keunggulan Komparatif Industri. Inisiatif: Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 3(3), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.30640/inisiatif.v3i3.2562