Keabsahan Akta Elektronik dalam Perspektif Hukum Kenotariatan dan Keadaan Memaksa

Authors

  • Bagus Eko Tri Cahyono Universitas Jember
  • Nuzulia Kumala Sari Universitas Jember
  • Moh. Ali Universitas Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v5i2.6795

Keywords:

Electronic Deeds, Notary, Validity Of The Deed, Cyber Notary

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has driven transformation across various sectors, including notarial practices through digitalization and the concept of cyber notary. However, the existence of electronic deeds within the Indonesian legal system continues to raise issues regarding their legal validity, particularly in relation to the formal requirements for authentic deeds. This study aims to analyze the possibility of executing electronic deeds from the perspective of notarial law and to examine whether force majeure (overmacht), such as the COVID-19 pandemic, can serve as a legal justification for such practices. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that, normatively, electronic deeds are not yet fully accommodated under Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Position, which still requires the physical presence of the parties before a notary as an essential element of authenticity. Although Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions recognizes electronic documents as valid legal evidence, such recognition does not automatically grant electronic deeds the status of authentic deeds within the notarial framework. Furthermore, force majeure conditions such as the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be used as a legal basis to override formal legal requirements, but rather function as a justification for the inability to fulfill certain legal obligations. Therefore, regulatory reform is necessary to accommodate technological advancements while maintaining the principles of prudence and legal certainty in notarial practice, particularly in addressing extraordinary circumstances in the future.

References

Abdal, O. K., & Handoko, W. (2024). Pembuatan Akta Autentik Oleh Notaris Pada Saat Pandemi Covid-19. Notarius, 16(3), 1121-1138. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i3.42357

Adjie, H. (2009). Sanksi perdata dan administratif terhadap notaris sebagai pejabat publik. Refika Aditama, 32

Adjie, H. (2011). Hukum notaris Indonesia: Tafsir tematik terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang jabatan notaris (Cetakan ke-3). Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2015). Teknik pembuatan akta satu: Konsep teoretis, kewenangan notaris, bentuk dan minuta akta. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Anshori, A. G. (2009). Lembaga kenotariatan Indonesia (Perspektif hukum dan etika). UII Press.

Arifin, M., Santoso, B., & Nugraha, A. (2023). Legal challenges of electronic notarial deeds in Indonesia's digital era. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 12(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v12i2.1045

Budiono, H. (2005). Pertanggungjawaban notaris berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2004 (Dilema notaris di antara negara, masyarakat, dan pasar). Majalah Renvoi.

Firmansyah, R., Hidayat, A., & Lestari, D. (2025). Cyber notary and legal certainty in digital public services. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 10(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i1.7890

Hapsari, N., Utomo, S., & Kurniawati, D. (2023). The implementation of digital legal services during the post-pandemic era in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 14(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v14i2.24811

Karwelo, E. S., Sjaifurrachman, S., & Suryaningsih, N. (2014). Prospek pembacaan dan penandatanganan akta notaris melalui video conference. Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 1(1), 1–21.

Koesoemawati, I., & Rijan, Y. (2009). Ke notaris. Raih Asa Sukses.

Kohar, A. (1983). Notaris dalam praktik hukum. PT Alumni.

Kurniawan, D., Sari, R., & Prabowo, A. (2024). Video conferencing as a legal medium in notarial practice: Opportunities and challenges. Jurnal Media Hukum, 31(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v31i1.21984

Kusuma, A., & Prasetyo, F. (2024). Regulatory reform of cyber notary in Indonesia: Comparative legal analysis. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 21(1), 45–60.

Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mertokusumo, S. (2006). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Mulyani, E., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Legal implications of remote notarial services during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(3), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.3.2021.367-382

Mulyoto. (2012). Perjanjian: Teknik, cara membuat, dan hukum perjanjian yang harus dikuasai (Edisi revisi). Cakrawala Media.

Nurita, E. (2012). Cyber notary: Pemahaman awal dalam konsep pemikiran. PT Refika Aditama.

Prajitno, A. A. A. (2010). Pengetahuan praktis tentang apa dan siapa notaris di Indonesia. Putra Media Nusantara.

Pratama, A., Siregar, H., & Putra, M. (2024). Digital transformation and the future of notarial services in Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 17(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v17i1.623

Putri, N., & Hidayat, Y. (2022). Electronic authentication and legal validity of digital documents in Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 11(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i3.956

Rahmawati, S., & Nugroho, A. (2023). Cyber notary development and legal adaptation in the digital era. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 30(2), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss2.art5

Sajadi, I., Widodo, J., & Suranto. (2015). Tanggung jawab notaris terhadap keabsahan akta notaris yang dibuatnya atas penghadap yang tidak dapat membaca dan menulis. Jurnal Repertorium, 2(2), 177–184.

Setiadewi, K., & Wijaya, I. M. H. (2020). Legalitas akta notaris berbasis cyber notary sebagai akta otentik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23446

Setiadewi, K., & Wijaya, I. M. H. (2020). Legalitas akta notaris berbasis cyber notary sebagai akta otentik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23446

Siregar, D., & Wibowo, R. (2022). Electronic documents as legal evidence in Indonesian civil law system. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.517-530

Sjaifurrachman. (2011). Aspek pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam pembuatan akta. Mandar Maju.

Subekti. (1980). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata (Cetakan ke-15). Intermasa.

Sundani, T. (2017). Analisis hukum atas penggunaan dan pembuatan akta notaris secara elektronik. Premise Law Journal, 1(1), 1–15.

Tjakup, I. K., Ardika, I. W., Putra, I. P. R. A., & Astiti, N. M. A. G. (2016). Akta notaris (akta otentik) sebagai alat bukti dalam peristiwa hukum perdata. Acta Comitas, 1(1), 180–188.

Tobing, R. D. (2012). Aspek-aspek hukum bisnis: Pengertian, asas, teori dan praktik. Laksbang Justitia.

Wahyuni, A. S. (2020). Urgensi akta autentik di masa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 18(1), 46–57.

Yuliana. (2020). Corona virus diseases (COVID-19): Sebuah tinjauan literatur. Wellness and Healthy Magazine, 2(1), 187–192.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Bagus Eko Tri Cahyono, Nuzulia Kumala Sari, & Moh. Ali. (2026). Keabsahan Akta Elektronik dalam Perspektif Hukum Kenotariatan dan Keadaan Memaksa. Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 5(2), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v5i2.6795