Relasi Intelektual Mazhab Basrah dan Kufah dalam Pembentukan Ilmu Nahwu: Analisis Epistemologi

Authors

  • Sundirah Sundirah UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Octa Syakila Salsabila Universitas Dr. H. Sumarno Banyuwangi
  • Anis Nurma Sabila UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Ba'iq Kurnia Buana Universitas Dr. H. Sumarno Banyuwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v5i1.6408

Keywords:

Basrah School, Epistemology, Grammar, Kufah School, Linguistic Data

Abstract

Arabic grammar as a system of Arabic grammar did not emerge suddenly, but rather developed through a complex intellectual process between the two largest centers of scholarship in the 2nd century AH, namely Basrah and Kufah. This study aims to analyze the intellectual relationship between the Basrah School and the Kufah School in the formation of Arabic grammar from an epistemological perspective. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature review. The data sources in this study include classical works of Arabic grammar that represent the views and methods of the Basrah and Kufah schools, as well as historical studies of Arabic grammar, contemporary research, and relevant literature on the philosophy of science. Data were collected through documentation and then analyzed using conceptual and comparative analysis to reveal differences in sources of knowledge. The results show that the Basrah and Kufah schools represent two different epistemic orientations. The Basrah school developed a rational-systematic approach by emphasizing strict selection of linguistic data (al-sama‘) and the use of qiyas as the main instrument of rule generalization. In contrast, the Kufah School developed an empirical approach by giving greater authority to sima’i data and variations in actual language usage. The intellectual relationship between the two schools was dialectical and complementary, thus contributing significantly to the formation of nahwu as a stable, coherent, and responsive scientific discipline.

References

Ahmad, M. T. (2020). Isytiqoq Perspektif Aliran Basrah dan Kufah. IJAS: Indonesian Journal of Arabic Studies, 2(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.24235/ijas.v2i1.6286

Akmalia, F., & Faizin, K. (2021). Recitation: An Alternative Method For Virtual Nahwu Learning. Ta’lim al-’Arabiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab & Kebahasaaraban, 5(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpba.v5i1.12435

Aryobimo, B., Abdurrahman, M., & Sopian, A. (2023). The Nahwu Kufah Mazhab’s View in Data Approach to Determining Rules. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.7.9

Asrina, A. (2016). KHILÂFIYAH NAHWIYYAH: Dialektika Pemikiran Nahwu Basrah dan Kufah dalam Catatan Ibn al-Anbâri. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v40i2.289

Dailatus Syamsiyah, Muhammad Iqbal Zamzami, Izzah Naelun Nikmah, & Syahrul Fauzi. (2023). Study Of The Basrah And Kuffah Schools In The Book Of Syarh Ibn Aqil: A Comparative Perspective. Al Mahāra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2023.091-05

Fassberg, T. (2022). The Greek death of Sībawayhi and the origins of Arabic grammar. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 85(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X22000593

Febriyanti, U., Abdurrahman, M., & Sopian, A. (2021). Is Historical Study of Nahwu on Madrasah Basra and Kufa Important to Teach? The Analysis of Opinion on Indonesian AFL Students. Al-Ta’rib : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab IAIN Palangka Raya, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.23971/altarib.v9i1.2522

Hairuddin. (2019). Akar Historis Lahirnya Ilmu Nahwu. Al Mahāra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 5(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2019.051-02

Hamid, A. (2011). Perdebatan Nahwu Aliran Basrah dan Kufah dalam Konteks Sosial-Budaya dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Research Collection.

Harianto, N. (2018). Beberapa Perbedan Masalah-masalah Nahwu Antara Bashrah dan Kufah dalam Kitab Al-Inshaaf Fi Masaa’il Al-Khilaf Bain Al-Nahwiyyin Al-Basryyin Wa Alkufyyin dan Dalil-Dalil Nahwu yang Digunakan. Tsaqofah Dan Tarikh: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Sejarah Islam, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.29300/ttjksi.v3i1.1552

M. Kamal. (2022). Mazhab-Mazhab Sintaksis Bahasa Arab Nahwu (Basrah, Kufah, Bagdad, Andalusia, Mesir). Jurnal Bina Ilmu Cendekia, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.46838/jbic.v3i1.119

Rini, R. (2019). Ushul al-Nahwi al-Arabi : Kajian Tentang Landasan Ilmu Nahwu. Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 3(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v3i1.773

Rizal, M., Abdurrahman, M., & Sopian, A. (2021). Sumber Landasan dalam Merumuskan kaidah-kaidah Nahwu dan Signifikansinya untuk Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. DAYAH: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(2), 208. https://doi.org/10.22373/jie.v4i2.9443

Versteegh, K. (2020). Kufan and Basran Grammarians on Case Assignment (ʿAmal). Al-Karmil: Studies in Arabic Language and Literature, 40–41. https://doi.org/10.12816/0058142

Yaacob, S. H. (2014). The Conflict of Theory in Arabic Grammar. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2014.v4.308

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Sundirah Sundirah, Octa Syakila Salsabila, Anis Nurma Sabila, & Ba’iq Kurnia Buana. (2026). Relasi Intelektual Mazhab Basrah dan Kufah dalam Pembentukan Ilmu Nahwu: Analisis Epistemologi. Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 5(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v5i1.6408