Degradasi Akta Notaris dalam Perkara Pidan (Analisa Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo Nomor: 862/Pid.B/2019/PN Sda)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v3i1.2224Keywords:
Notary, Authentic Deed, Criminal Offence, ForgeryAbstract
This study aims to determine the legal consequences of misuse of notary authority to make deeds. Notaries in carrying out the duties of their office must be careful and careful in making deeds, so that the deeds they make are not legally defective because they must be accounted to the general public and so as not to harm others. This research uses a conceptual approach and a legal approach. Using a conceptual approach, researchers refer to legal principles related to the concept of the state of letters in the case of forgery of letters. The legal approach is carried out by reviewing related laws and regulations. This research is analytical in nature that studies the purpose of law, the values of justice, the truth of the rule of law, legal concepts and legal norms according to the position of deeds in relation to the implementation of the duties of unscrupulous authentic deed makers. The results of this study conclude that the criteria for a notary deed to become an authentic deed have been regulated in the law, so that Notaries who are officials who are authorized to make authentic deeds must always pay attention to the procedures for making deeds in accordance with applicable laws. When the deed loses its evidentiary power, it can be relegated to a deed under hand, or become invalid or become null and void. So the Notary Public must be responsible for his negligence in exercising his authority. If the authentic deed in its making is a legal defect caused solely by the fault of the Notary and then the deed in Court is declared inauthentic, or invalid, or becomes null and void or relegated to a deed under hand, then the Notary concerned must be liable for the error caused by the forgery of the deed.
References
A. Plito (1986) Pembuktian dan Daluwarsa, Alih Bahasa M. Isa Arief, Intermasa, Jakarta.
Abror, S., Mansar, A., & Limbong, F. S. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Hak Waris Yang Mengalami Degradasi Nilai Pembuktian (Studi Putusan PN Cianjur No. 259/PID.B/2015/PN.CJR). Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(4), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i4.1085.
Adjie H, & Hafidh M. (2017). Akta notaris untuk perbankan syariah (Widiyani Retno, Ed.; 2nd ed., Vol. 1). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Adjie H, & Sesung R. (2020). Tafsir, penjelasan, dan komentar atas undang-undang jabatan notaris (Atif N F, Ed.; 2nd ed., Vol. 1). Refika Aditama.
Adjie, H. (2011). Aspek pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam pembuatan akta. Mandar Maju. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=8MnCMwEACAAJ.
Adolf, J., Handoko, W., Program, A., & Kenotariatan, S. M. (2020). EKSISTENSI WEWENANG NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA BIDANG PERTANAHAN. NOTARIUS, 13(1).
Andi Hamzah (2005) Kamus Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia,
Ayuningtyas, P. (2020). SANKSI TERHADAP NOTARIS DALAM MELANGGAR KODE ETIK. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9i2.637. DALAM MEMBUAT AKTA OLEH NOTARIS. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Dewi, K. O. (2019). PENYULUHAN HUKUM TENTANG PEMBUATAN AKTA OLEH NOTARIS. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 4(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.4.1.59-70.
Diana, S. N., Mispansyah, M., & Syaufi, A. (2020). Kedudukan Akta Berhubungan dengan Pelaksanaan Jabatan dari Oknum Notaris yang Berijazah Palsu. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 5(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v5i2.187.
Habib Adjie (2017), Akta Notaris Untuk Perbankan Syariah, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Jenifer Maria. (2020). Pembatalan Akta Notariil Oleh Notaris. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 4(4), 408–415. http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/index. Kenotariatan◼, 11(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v11i1.1640.
Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek)
Liliana Tedjosaputro (2003) Etika Profesi dan Profesi Hukum, Aneka Ilmu, Semarang, 2003
Muhammad Hasan. (2022). Urgensi Penerapan Klausula Eksonerasi dalam Produk Hukum yang Dibuat oleh Notaris,. Urnal Nasional Akreditasi, 229–240.
Mustaqim L. (2018, July 7). Bentuk Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Otentik. Dasar Hukum.
Pratama, B., Warsito, H., & Adriansyah, H. (2022). PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo dengan Nomor Putusan: 862/Pid.B/2019/PN Sda.
Rahman M. (2022, October 18). Bedanya Akta Notaris Tanah dan PPAT. Rumah123.Com.
Romavita, & Yetniwati. (2022). 18949-Article Text-54187-2-10-20220628. Recital Review, 4(2), 452–473.
Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie (2011), Aspek Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Soekidjo Notoatmojo, (2010) Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta,
Sudikno M. (2019). Mengenal hukum : suatu pengantar (S. Kep. , Ns. Riris Andriati, Ed.; Cetakan I, Vol. 1). Yogyakarta : Maha Karya Pustaka.
Tan Thong Kie (2011), Studi Notariat & Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris, PT. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakara.
Titik Triwulan dan Shinta Febrian (2010) Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pasien, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Zuliana Naro Baubara (2011), Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pembuatan Akta Notaris (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan) Fakultas Hukum USU Medan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
